|
"Two hundred years of American technology |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
PHOTOGRAPHY BY GLEN E. FRIEDMAN |
|||||
![]() |
|
Tony Alva at the original Dog Bowl, 1977 |
|||||
|
…Most people probably won’t understand some of this, but that really doesn’t matter since
the intrinsic elements of this discussion are meant for those who really skate (just owning a
skateboard or the old “I was into it ten years ago, so I understand it now,” doesn’t qualify
one as a skater). Modern skateboarding is a constantly evolving hybrid very few
comprehend. In dealing with the old versus the new, one must take several things into
consideration. First, the “high state of the art” premise is a pile of crap. At the present time,
there is little being done that is a radical departure from the 1960’s. The freestyle area is
just coming up to the level of the mid-60’s. (The big difference here is that there are more
people now who are closing in on the advanced levels). In the downhill and slalom, there
are increasing numbers who participate (their confidence being based upon the soft grip of
the urethane wheel). All that can be said here is that the validity or lack of it in an objective
speed situation is obvious. The composition wheels of the pre-urethane era offered a
harder, faster rolling surface, and generally speaking, 40 m.p.h. ten years ago was more of
an accomplishment than it is today. In fact, many of the older slalom/downhill boys seem to
be doing quite well today, perhaps due to having learned on faster rolling, poorer gripping
equipment. In other words, they have got their act down. At this current juncture. one must
keep in mind that these days are the infancy of the neo-skate renaissance. The big
breakthroughs are yet to come, since the current practitioners really haven’t even begun to
reach their marks.
As for skate technology, it’s just starting to improve; up to this point, the vast majority of products on the market are fast buck oriented, ten year old trips. The better skaters will create a demand for better equipment, and the better manufacturers will fill it. As a reference point, it would be interesting to see some of these skateboard manufacturers forced into a 40 m.p.h. run on their own equipment—this would really separate the men from the boys. In retrospect, the last time around, the hotter skaters pushed it as far as they could go. To a great extent, they helped bring about the short ski — short surfboard revolution, since their refined technique far surpassed the more stationary orientations of the long ski and long stick trip. Abilities and attitudes honed on a 24”-36” skate could no longer confine themselves to surfing in place on a 9’6”; i.e., 114 inches. It will be enlightening to see what sort of changes the current crop of skaters brings about in related fields in the not so distant future. People have been surf skating banks for 15 years. In the 60’s, many of these people existed outside of the syndrome of the competition/exhibition team. It was impossible to transport the bank situation to the department stores and shopping centers across America. Bank riding represents a three-dimensional opportunity—a downhill gradient as modified by the degree of side slope and contours such as bowls, moguls, twists, cracks and other factors around which you must constantly readjust. If the present formal competitive structure is to become relevant to the real challenges and esoteric rewards inherent in skateboarding, the movement must become sensitive to the realities by not reducing skateboarding to a conveniently packaged commodity. SkateBoarder Magazine vol.2 #2, Fall 1975
| |||||
|
contents | 1 | 2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
G.E.F. Early Dog Days
|
|||||